Search
Now showing items 1-8 of 8
Aesop's Fables
(Doubleday, 1968)
Use the AI at the back. Table of illustrations on 19. The illustrations have a simple charm, but I think that one of them is enough for a good illustrated lecture. Do not miss Tinkelman's dust jacket illustration up and ...
Aesop's Fables
(Lancer BooksMagnum Books, 1968)
I see only two things that justify the existence of this book: its slightly larger than average print (advertised as at least 30% larger) and the great question on its first page: Can you guess the moral? I am keeping ...
Aesop's Fables
(Junior Deluxe Editions, 1968)
The same material one finds in the standard Doubleday editions (1968) with the exception of Singer's introduction and the AI at the back. The print is larger, the order of fables is rearranged, and there seem to be fewer of them.
Aesop's Fables
(C. R. Gibson Co., 1968)
Delightful both in its verse and its drawings. Worth looking over for something that can be used. The text and the drawings are well integrated. The texts have some spice. The hare ends up holding up the fox reaching ...
Aesop's Fables
(Doubleday, 1968)
This copy is internally identical with another in the collection, a gift of Gerry McKevitt, S.J. This copy has a red dust-jacket labelled, on its inside front flap, Book Club Edition. It uses gold ink on the front cover ...
Aesop's Fables
(Franklin Watts, 1968)
An old Library of Congress book that was never taken out once and so is in excellent condition. Vastly superior in its illustrations to the Avenel facsimile (1975?). This is not a facsimile, for it omits the illustration ...
Aesop's Fables
(Hamlyn House, 1968)
An unpretentious kids' book with a surprising variety of illustration styles and an unusual selection of stories: The Greedy Fox, GA, The Bee and the Honey, TMCM, The Boastful Frog, SW, LM, Going to Anywhere ...
Aesop's Fables
(Franklin Watts, 1968)
Here is a dust-jacketed reprinting of a book already in the collection under 1968. Vastly superior in its illustrations to the Avenel facsimile (1975?). This is not a facsimile, for it omits the illustration of the ...