Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEhrlich, Donnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHicks, George Jacoben_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T18:12:50Z
dc.date.available2018-01-01T09:40:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-08en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/107874
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative dissertation in practice followed an exploratory case study design using document analysis of interim reports to methodically review the assessment plans and measurement tools of accredited radiography programs. The goal was to understand the quality of programs’ assessment plans specifically in terms of defining, measuring, and collecting student learning data. The aim was twofold: First, to inform the professional practice setting of the current state of assessment mechanics knowledge of accredited-radiography programs and second, to make recommendations to the professional practice setting in effort to improve the assessment practices within all JRCERT-accredited educational programs. The researcher designed a meta-assessment rubric to evaluate the quality of assessment mechanics of the assessment plans. The meta-assessment rubric allowed the researcher to explore the quality of assessment plan’s goals, student learning outcomes, measurement tools, and benchmarks against the best practice performance levels of the respective rubric category. The findings suggest the understanding of assessment mechanics were lacking in the program directors or faculty responsible for the assessment plans of the case study. The implementation of a meta-assessment rubric as a programmatic self-assessment tool can benefit program directors – as the assessment leaders – in critical discernment of the quality of their program’s assessment practices. The meta-assessment rubric should allow radiography faculty the opportunity to delve deeper into the analysis of their assessment practices, determine the quality of their assessment plans, and make evidence-based decisions that support and enhance student learning, curricular reform, pedagogical changes, and faculty development. |Keywords: Assessment mechanics, outcomes assessment, meta-assessment, radiography.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCreighton Universityen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is retained by the Author. A non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above.en_US
dc.titleA Meta-Assessment of the Outcomes Assessment Practices of Accredited Radiography Educational Programsen_US
dc.typeDissertation
dc.rights.holderGeorge Jacob Hicksen_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.description.noteProQuest Traditional Publishing Optionen_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorHicks, George Jacoben_US
dc.embargo.terms2018-01-01
dc.degree.levelEdD (Doctor of Education)en_US
dc.degree.disciplineInterdisciplinary Ed.D. Program in Leadershipen_US
dc.degree.nameEd.D. Program in Leadershipen_US
dc.degree.grantorGraduate Schoolen_US
dc.degree.committeeHatfield, Susanen_US
dc.degree.committeeJensen, Gailen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record