Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLindvall, Alexander J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-03T21:52:29Z
dc.date.available2020-02-03T21:52:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/125945
dc.description.abstractThis article argues that the First Amendment does not prevent the States from enforcing well-crafted civil and criminal anti-doxing statutes. Part II of this article proposes two anti-doxing statutes—one civil, one criminal—that would likely survive a First Amendment challenge. Part III explains how existing precedent does not prevent the government from regulating and punishing doxing. Part IV addresses likely counter-arguments to this article.en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titlePolitical Hacktivism: Doxing & the First Amendmenten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume53en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.pages1-14en_US
dc.date.year2019en_US
dc.date.monthDecember
dc.description.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record