Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeland, Creighton R., Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-03T21:56:37Z
dc.date.available2020-02-03T21:56:37Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/125946
dc.description.abstractThis Article proceeds in six sections: Section I describes the corporate board diversity statutes (both enacted and potential) and identifies the legal issues they create. Section II analyzes the validity of these laws under the Fourteenth Amendment by discussing the standards applicable to race and sex. Sections III and IV analyze the validity of these laws under, respectively, the Dormant Commerce Clause and the internal affairs doctrine. Section V identifies who may challenge these laws, including considerations of standing. Section VI evaluates the public policy consequences of corporate board diversity statutes. The statute critiqued is from California, which has recently enacted a corporate board diversity statute that creates sex-based quotas. This Article will also comment on the California legislative declarations and findings and will sometimes discuss related legislative activity in other states.en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleShould Courts Uphold Corporate Board Diversity Statutes?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume53en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.pages15-76en_US
dc.date.year2019en_US
dc.date.monthDecember
dc.description.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record