Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSimanek, Justice A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-03T22:23:07Z
dc.date.available2020-02-03T22:23:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/125951
dc.description.abstractThis Note will first examine the facts and holding of Arce. This Note will also discuss the importance of Judge Kelly’s dissenting opinion in Silva v. United States to the Arce decision. Next, this Note will dive into the background and precedent leading to the Arce and Silva decisions. Finally, this Note will analyze both the Ninth Circuit and the Eighth Circuit decisions and will conclude that Arce v. United States was correctly decided while Silva v. United States ignored United States Supreme Court precedent in order to advance the Eighth Circuit’s own interpretation of § 1252(g).en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleArce v. United States: The Ninth Circuit Correctly Interpreted § 1252(g) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 While the Eighth Circuit Ignored Supreme Court Precedent in Silva v. United Statesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume53en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.pages239-266en_US
dc.date.year2019en_US
dc.date.monthDecember
dc.description.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record