Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCole, Daniel J. Jr.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-11T19:48:01Z
dc.date.available2013-02-11T19:48:01Z
dc.date.issued1969en_US
dc.identifier.citation2 Creighton L. Rev. 171 (1968-1969)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38615
dc.description.abstractFIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|In the October 1967 term, the Supreme Court of the United States decided three cases which extended the use of the writ of habeas corpus in the federal court system. In the three cases, Walker v. Wainwright, Peyton v. Rowe, and Carafas v. LaVallee, the Court broadened the definition of the term "in custody" as used in the Federal Habeas Corpus Act. It is the purpose of this paper to explore the implications of those decisions and consider the possibility of future expansion of the remedy of habeas corpus in light of the continuing evolution of the "in custody" concept...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleWalker, Rowe and Carafas: The Expanding Concept of in Custodyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume2en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1968-1969en_US
dc.description.pages171en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record