Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCarten, Paul V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T22:11:35Z
dc.date.available2013-02-12T22:11:35Z
dc.date.issued1974en_US
dc.identifier.citation7 Creighton L. Rev. 736 (1973-1974)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38787
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|Courts are faced with an ever increasing volume of welfare related cases. A recent Connecticut supreme court case, Longs v. Harder, considered whether a child's personal injury recovery, held in guardianship for him under the direction and control of the probate court, was an "available resource" which could be considered in determining qualification for welfare benefits under Connecticut welfare regulations. In holding that a tort recovery was an available resource, and thereby upholding the welfare department's ruling denying the child future eligibility for AFDC assistance, the Connecticut court appears to have made a departure from well-established precedents...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleWelfare Law - AFDC Assistance - Connecticut Supreme Court Holds That State Welfare Commissioner May Consider a Child's Tort Recovery in Determining Eligibility for AFDC Benefits - Langs v. Harder, 35 No. 26 Conn. L.J. 7 - A.2d - (1973)en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume7en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1973-1974en_US
dc.description.pages736en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record