Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T01:23:24Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T01:23:24Z
dc.date.issued1976en_US
dc.identifier.citation9 Creighton L. Rev. 2 (1975-1976)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38865
dc.description.abstractFIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|In two cases decided during the survey period, the Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed decisions of the Court of Industrial Relations. Both cases involved a school board appealing from an order affecting salary and other terms and conditions of employment of its teachers.|In one of these cases 2 the appealing school board challenged the constitutionality of the statutory provision authorizing the Court of Industrial Relations to make orders affecting wages and conditions of employment. The contention was that there were not sufficiently definite guidelines for this delegation of legislative power to an administrative body. The statute requires the Court of Industrial Relations to establish rates of pay and conditions of employment comparable to those of workers with like skills under similar working conditions, taking into consideration total compensation, i.e., vacation, sick leave, insurance and pension benefits, etc., as well as wages. These guidelines were found sufficiently definite and clear to uphold the legislature's delegation of power to affect wages and conditions of employment to the Court of Industrial Relations...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleAdministrative Law - Supreme Court Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume9en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1975-1976en_US
dc.description.pages2en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record