Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVolkmer, Ronald R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T01:23:31Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T01:23:31Z
dc.date.issued1976en_US
dc.identifier.citation9 Creighton L. Rev. 149 (1975-1976)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38880
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|The decision of the Nebraska Supreme Court in Knoefler Honey Farms v. County of Sherman dealt in general terms with the topic of appeals of decisions from the county board of equalization to the district court. The decision affects not only county board of equalization appeals in cases similar to Knoefler, it also affects the manner in which certain other appeals are made. Insofar as the Knoefler decision explicitly detailed the steps to be taken in appealing from a decision of the county board of equalization, it is a welcome decision; but whether the court's interpretation of the statutes involved a correct one or not is open to question, and that question will be discussed in this article. In addition to an analysis of the Knoefler opinion, this article will discuss the effect of Knoefler on appeals of cases involving denials of tax exemptions...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleTaxation - Appeals from Decisions of the County Board of Equalization: Not a Land of Milk and Honeyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume9en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1975-1976en_US
dc.description.pages149en_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorVolkmer, Ronald R.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record