Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSnow, Ronald J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T01:39:46Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T01:39:46Z
dc.date.issued1977en_US
dc.identifier.citation10 Creighton L. Rev. 394 (1976-1977)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38965
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|Employee pension funds constituted the largest and perhaps most abused depository of unregulated capital in the United States prior to 1974. Despite congressional concern and patchwork legislation during the past three decades, many employees trying to collect pensions realized that their expectations had been illusory. To remedy these abuses, Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA] to regulate the administration of private pension funds; but this legislation did not provide complete protection of a pension investment....en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleSecurities - Pensions - Securities Laws Antifraud Provisions Held Facially Applicable to Employee Pension Plansen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume10en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1976-1977en_US
dc.description.pages394en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record