Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMyers, Thomas A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T01:39:52Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T01:39:52Z
dc.date.issued1977en_US
dc.identifier.citation10 Creighton L. Rev. 711 (1976-1977)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38979
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|A liability insurer's obligations of defense and indemnity traditionally have not been a basis for quasi in rem jurisdiction., When the New York Court of Appeals allowed these duties to be attached in Seider v. Roth, the resulting doctrine established a new basis for quasi in rem jurisdiction.- The doctrine permits a resident plaintiff to bring a lawsuit in New York for a tort committed by a nonresident in another state. Attachment of the obligations of the insurer to defend and indemnify is permissible if there is an insurance contract between the defendant and his insurer and the insurer does business within the forum state. The Seider decision has been rejected by other courts and it has received extensive criticism by commentators...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleInsurer's Obligations to Defend and Indemnify as a Basis for Quasi in Rem Jurisdiction: Seider Revisited, Anen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume10en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1976-1977en_US
dc.description.pages711en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record