Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDougherty, Sandra L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T03:12:30Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T03:12:30Z
dc.date.issued1981en_US
dc.identifier.citation14 Creighton L. Rev. 397 (1980-1981)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/39256
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|In the past survey year the Nebraska Supreme Court defined for the first time the term "to leave work voluntarily" as used in the Employment Security Law and decided two other labor cases of first impression. Both labor cases were appeals from decisions made by the Nebraska Commission of Industrial Relations (CIR). In Nebraska Association of Public Employees v. State Department of Education, the court enunciated for the first time its approval of the CIR standard for ordering a new election for exclusive bargaining representatives because of last-minute campaign misrepresentations. In Transport Workers of America, Local 223 v. Transit Authority of Omaha, the court articulated for the first time its present policy regarding CIR jurisdiction over a dispute involving the parties rights and obligations under an existing labor contract. This article will primarily focus on the court's present approach to CIR decisions as illustrated by its handling of these two Nebraska cases and then briefly address the Employment Security Law case...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleLabor Lawen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume14en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1980-1981en_US
dc.description.pages397en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record