Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFera, Richard Dennisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T18:51:37Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T18:51:37Z
dc.date.issued1983en_US
dc.identifier.citation16 Creighton L. Rev. 1113 (1982-1983)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/39458
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|The doctrine of estoppel arises in the transfer of patent rights in two analogous situations--estoppel of an assignor and estoppel of a licensee. In the assignment of a patent the inventor transfers to the assignee legal title to the patent in exchange for royalties. If an assignor continues to manufacture the patented invention after an assignment, the assignee may bring an action for infringement. A patent license, however, is not a transfer of title. It only permits the licensee to manufacture, use or sell the patented invention for a royalty, free from any claim of infringement by the inventor...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titlePatents - Span-Deck, Inc. v. Fab-Con, Inc.: Does a Licensee's Mere Cessation of Royalty Payments Constitute a Challenge to Patent Validityen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume16en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1982-1983en_US
dc.description.pages1113en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record