Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFurey, Nancy M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T20:14:58Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T20:14:58Z
dc.date.issued1985en_US
dc.identifier.citation18 Creighton L. Rev. 1087 (1984-1985)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/39575
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|Federal Rule of Evidence 407 precludes the admission of evidence of subsequent remedial measures if offered to prove negligence or culpable conduct. The Rule allows admission of such evidence for other purposes"such as proving ownership, control, or feasibility of precautionary measures, if controverted, or impeachment." These exceptions, however, were intended to be illustrative, not exhaustive. Thus, courts have allowed evidence of subsequent remedial measures for purposes other than those enumerated in Rule 407...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleSubsequent Remedial Measures in the Eighth Circuit - The Confusion Continuesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume18en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1984-1985en_US
dc.description.pages1087en_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorFiroz, Muhammaden_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record