Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMangrum, Richard Collinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T21:54:40Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T21:54:40Z
dc.date.issued1988en_US
dc.identifier.citation21 Creighton L. Rev. 509 (1987-1988)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/39718
dc.description.abstractFIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|Expert testimony, the French pastry of earlier litigation, has become meat and potatoes for the modern litigator. The expanded role of experts in litigation is the product of both the increasing complexity of our society and the increasing simplicity of expert evidence rules. Change, however, fosters confusion. Not surprisingly, this past term in Nebraska a disproportionate number of cases that were appealed on evidentiary grounds raised issues relating to the admission and exclusion of expert testimony. This Article relies on these recent cases in an effort to explicate Nebraska's expert evidence rules. The litigator's increasing dependence on expert testimony as a staple rather than dessert justifies such a case analysis. These cases, it is suggested, yield several lessons for litigators handling expert testimony...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleHandling Expert Testimony in Nebraska: Lessons from Recent Casesen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume21en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1987-1988en_US
dc.description.pages509en_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorMangrum, Richard Collinen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record