Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKralik, Lisa M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-14T22:15:01Z
dc.date.available2013-02-14T22:15:01Z
dc.date.issued1989en_US
dc.identifier.citation22 Creighton L. Rev. 1167 (1988-1989)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/39793
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|The twenty-first amendment" explicitly authorizes state regulation of liquor and embodies the only constitutional grant of power to the states. North Dakota's attempt to enforce legislation enacted under the twenty-first amendment was thwarted by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in United States v. North Dakota. In North Dakota the court held that out-of-state liquor intended for consumption and sale on military bases over which the United States and North Dakota exercised concurrent jurisdiction could not be labeled to prevent unlawful diversion into the domestic commerce of the state. The North Dakota statutes were invalidated under the supremacy clause, and the "core power" of the twenty-first amendment was not extended to concurrent jurisdiction enclaves...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleAbuse of State Power Guaranteed by the Twenty-First Amendment - Preventing the Diversion of Out-of-State Liquor Destined for Federal Enclave: United States v. North Dakotaen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume22en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note1988-1989en_US
dc.description.pages1167en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record