Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChiesa, Luis E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-18T17:55:10Z
dc.date.available2013-02-18T17:55:10Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citation44 Creighton L. Rev. 647 (2010-2011)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/40719
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|Few legal canons are as well known to the general public as the requirement that the prosecution prove the culpability of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. The popularity of the doctrine is such that movies, books, record albums, and even a radio show have been named in its honor. Although the roots of the doctrine can be traced back to the formative years of our Nation, the Supreme Court of the United States crystallized it as binding precedent in the landmark decision of In re Winship thirty-eight years ago. Despite the fact that the Court has had various opportunities to flesh out the contours of the doctrine, the meaning and scope of the doctrine remain unclear...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleWhen an Offense is Not an Offense: Rethinking the Supreme Court's Reasonable Doubt Jurisprudenceen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume44en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note2010-2011en_US
dc.description.pages647en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record