Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee Terryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-28T16:23:39Z
dc.date.available2013-05-28T16:23:39Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citation46 Creighton L. Rev. 61(2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/42888
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|The Keystone XL Pipeline ("Keystone XL") represents one of the most promising economic opportunities currently available. When government officials talk about an economic opportunity for the country, often they should be talking about an opportunity for the federal government to get out of the way. Keystone XL is one such opportunity. Nonetheless, critics hope the government will block Keystone XL's construction based on several concerns: that Keystone XL would carry a type of oil that is especially corrosive, that greenhouse gas emissions would be especially high with the type of product it will transport, that oil and gas prices could actually increase as a result of increased petroleum supply , or that the use of carbon based fuels could continue for some time...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleKeystone XL: The Pipeline to Energy Securityen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume46en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note2012-2013en_US
dc.description.pages61en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record