Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLam, Danielen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-11T00:58:48Z
dc.date.available2013-07-11T00:58:48Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citation46 Creighton L. Rev. 433 (2012-2013)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/43450
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, prohibits employers from discriminating against their employees based on race, national origin, color, religion, or sex. The protections of Title VII are not generally available to employees of the military unless the military employee is deemed a civilian employee. This is the case because courts have generally applied Feres v. United States (the "Feres doctrine") to bar Title VII claims by servicemembers arising out of actions incident to service...en_US
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.titleWetherill v. Geren: The Eighth Circuit Erred by Applying the Feres Doctrine to Bar Dual Status Military Technicians from Bringing Civil Actions under Title VIIen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.description.volume46en_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.description.note2012-2013en_US
dc.description.pages433en_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorLam, Danielen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record