• Login
    View Item 
    •   CDR Home
    • Creighton Research and Scholarship including the Faculty Bibliography
    • Faculty Bibliography Database
    • View Item
    •   CDR Home
    • Creighton Research and Scholarship including the Faculty Bibliography
    • Faculty Bibliography Database
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Elite law firm mergers and reputations competition: Is bigger really better? An international comparison

    View/Open
    Aronson_40VandJTransnat'lL763.pdf (4.257Mb)
    Creighton Authors
    Aronson, Bruce E.

    Admin. Units
    School of Law

    Subjects
    Law firms

    Title
    Elite law firm mergers and reputations competition: Is bigger really better? An international comparison

    Authors
    Aronson, Bruce E.

    Journal
    Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

    Volume
    40

    Issue
    3

    Pages
    763-831

    Date
    2007, May

    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link
    Check for Full-Text (may not be available)

    Other Link(s)
    SSRN

    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10504/46877
    Citation
    Bruce E. Aronson, Elite Law Firm Mergers and Reputations Competition: Is Bigger Really Better? An International Comparison, 40 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 763 (2007).

    Abstract
    Although rapid law firm growth has been with us since the 1980s, the acceleration of this trend over the last decade by means of mergers is puzzling. Why would normally conservative law firms embark on a merger strategy which appears to encompass significant risk and uncertain benefits? And is this trend a peculiarly American (or Anglo-American) phenomenon?
     
    Most of the popular explanations for law firm mergers focus on a single factor; law firms everywhere cite strikingly similar reasons based on a presumed client demand for "one-stop shopping." This article contributes to providing a more robust, multi-causal explanation for law firm behavior through a comparative study of reputational competition among elite law firms in selected jurisdictions - the U.S., U.K., Germany, Australia and Japan. It posits that industry consolidation and changing market conditions have intensified law firm competition, and that since firm quality is hard to measure law firms compete largely on the basis of reputation. Many law firms are thus paradoxically driven to engage in (defensive) mergers to meet the competition due to their risk averse nature and the fear of losing existing clients.
     
    The study considers circumstances which are likely to lead to mergers through an examination of reputational competition, particularly the elements of reputational signaling, herd behavior and reputational status as "first-tier" law firms. It identifies "rules of the game" for firm behavior with respect to international mergers. It finds that the impact of a strategic decision, such as a merger, by a first-tier firm is of far greater significance than a similar action by another elite firm; it is much more likely to lead to defensive actions, such as mergers, by competitor firms. Thus, which firms engage in merger activity in a given market is an important factor in explaining and predicting both the reaction of competitors and whether mergers will become widespread in that market.
     
    This study further suggests that the common phenomenon of law firm mergers is likely a result of law firms reacting to similar types of changes in their operating environment (i.e., a parallel development), rather than convergence to an "Anglo-American" model of the law firm.
     
    Copyright Holder
    Copyright (c) 2007 Bruce E. Aronson

    Collections
    • Former Law Faculty Publications
    • Faculty Bibliography Database

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of the CDRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV