Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBorchers, Patrick J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-09T15:56:15Z
dc.date.available2015-11-09T15:56:15Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.citationPatrick J. Borchers, The Problem with General Jurisdiction, 2001 U. Chi. Legal F. 119.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0892-5593en_US
dc.identifier.issn0892-5593en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/73140
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the U.S. phenomenon of so-called "general jurisdiction." General jurisdiction involves unrelated activities of a corporation or business entity that are so pervasive that they subject the corporation to jurisdiction without regard to whether its activities are related to the claim. In two recent cases, the U.S. Supreme Court has seemingly contracted the boundaries of general jurisdiction. This article was cited in the Supreme Court's 2014 decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman finding that the presence in the forum of a subsidiary corporation did not subject it to jurisdiction.en_US
dc.titleProblem with general jurisdictionen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright (c) 2001 Patrick J. Borchersen_US
dc.description.volume2001en_US
dc.title.workUniversity of Chicago Legal Forumen_US
dc.description.pages119-139en_US
dc.subject.fastJurisdictionen_US
dc.url.fasthttp://id.worldcat.org/fast/00985026en_US
dc.date.year2001en_US
dc.program.unitSchool of Lawen_US
dc.url.link3http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2380873en_US
dc.url.link1https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf2001&collection=journals&id=123en_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorBorchers, Patrick J.en_US
dc.identifier.viafhttp://viaf.org/viaf/165068140en_US
dc.identifier.isnihttp://isni.org/isni/000000011720119X
dc.identifier.wcihttp://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n96029505/en_US
dc.identifier.ssrnhttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=378743en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record