Constitutional limitations on state-court jurisdiction: A historical-interpretative reexamination of the full faith and credit and due process clauses (Part Two)
View/ Open
Creighton Authors
Whitten, Ralph U.
Whitten, Ralph U.
Admin. Units
School of Law
School of Law
Subjects
Civil procedure; Constitutional law; Jurisdiction; Due process of law; Conflict of laws; Judgments, Foreign
Civil procedure; Constitutional law; Jurisdiction; Due process of law; Conflict of laws; Judgments, Foreign
Title
Constitutional limitations on state-court jurisdiction: A historical-interpretative reexamination of the full faith and credit and due process clauses (Part Two)
Constitutional limitations on state-court jurisdiction: A historical-interpretative reexamination of the full faith and credit and due process clauses (Part Two)
Authors
Whitten, Ralph U.
Whitten, Ralph U.
Journal
Creighton Law Review
Creighton Law Review
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
735-852
14
Issue
3
Pages
735-852
Date
1981, Winter
1981, Winter
Metadata
Show full item record
Link
Check for Full-Text (may not be available)
Check for Full-Text (may not be available)
Other Link(s)
SSRN
SSRN
Citation
Ralph U. Whitten, The Constitutional Limitations on State-Court Jurisdiction: A Historical-Interpretative Reexamination of the Full Faith and Credit and Due Process Clauses (Part Two), 14 Creighton L. Rev. 735 (1981), reprinted in Jurisdiction and Private International Law 70 (Patrick J. Borchers ed., 2014).
Ralph U. Whitten, The Constitutional Limitations on State-Court Jurisdiction: A Historical-Interpretative Reexamination of the Full Faith and Credit and Due Process Clauses (Part Two), 14 Creighton L. Rev. 735 (1981), reprinted in Jurisdiction and Private International Law 70 (Patrick J. Borchers ed., 2014).
Abstract
This article discusses the original meaning of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment in order to decide whether the Supreme Court correctly interpreted the traditional rules of international jurisdiction in the case of Pennoyer v. Neff. This includes a discussion on whether the clause was designed to include "substantive" components.
Copyright Holder
Copyright (c) 1981 Ralph U. Whitten
Copyright (c) 1981 Ralph U. Whitten