Now showing items 1-10 of 20
One step forward and two back: Missed opportunities in refining the United States minimum contacts test and the European Union Brussels I Regulation
In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two cases regarding the scope of the "minimum contacts" test for permissible exercises of personal jurisdiction. In one case, relying on ill-defined notions of sovereignty, a plurality ...
American conflicts law: Cases and materials
Punitive damages, forum shopping, and the conflict of laws
Few issues have as profound an impact on civil litigation as the availability and dimensions of punitive damages. States, however, vary considerably on whether punitive damages are allowed, the quantum and burden of proof ...
Real risk of forum shopping: A dissent from Shady Grove
This article is written as a hypothetical dissenting opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co. In that case, the Court held that a federal court sitting ...
Conflict of laws
McIntyre Machinery, Goodyear, and the incoherence of the minimum contacts test
On June 27, 2011, when J. McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. Nicastro and Goodyear Dunlop Tire Operations, S.A. v. Brown were handed down, it marked the first time in almost a quarter century that the United States Supreme Court ...
Emergence of quasi rules in U.S. conflicts law
Jurisdiction and private international law
(Edward Elgar, 2014)
Conflict of laws: Cases and materials
(Foundation Press, 2013)