Now showing items 1-4 of 4
Enriching judicial independence: Seeking to improve the retention vote phase of an appointive selection system
John F. Irwin & Daniel L. Real, Enriching Judicial Independence: Seeking to Improve the Retention Vote Phase of an Appointive Selection System, 34 Fordham Urb. L.J. 453 (2007).
This article discusses the subjects of judicial selection and judicial independence, focusing on retention votes in appointive selection systems. The article includes a historical look at judicial selection and retention ...
Thoughts about enriching judicial independence by improving the retention vote phase of appointive selection systems
John F. Irwin & Daniel L. Real, Thoughts About Enriching Judicial Independence by Improving the Retention Vote Phase of Appointive Selection Systems, 43 Ct. Rev. 60 (2006).
This article concerns improving the judicial retention vote in selective appointment systems.
Judicial independence and retention votes
John Irwin & Daniel L. Real, Judicial Independence and Retention Votes, Neb. Law., Jan. 2011, at 5.
This is a Nebraska Lawyer magazine article reprinting the prior Court Review magazine article by this author. The article concerns thoughts about improving judicial independence by taking steps to improve judicial retention ...
Ties won't do Supreme Court justice
G. Michael Fenner, Op-Ed., Ties Won't Do Supreme Court Justice, Omaha World-Herald, Feb. 17, 2016, at 7B.