Now showing items 1-10 of 17
Back to the future: Original intent as a means for vitalizing the fourteenth amendment in the context of race
Raneta J. Lawson, Back to the Future: Original Intent as a Means for Vitalizing the Fourteenth Amendment in the Context of Race, 5 St. Thomas L. Rev. 245 (1992) (reviewing Donald E. Lively, Constitution and Race).
State aid to students in religiously affiliated schools: Agostini v. Felton
R. Collin Mangrum, State Aid to Students in Religiously Affiliated Schools: Agostini v. Felton, 31 Creighton L. Rev. 1155 (1998).
Falling star of free exercise: Free exercise and substantive due process entitlement claims in City of Boerne v. Flores
R. Collin Mangrum, The Falling Star of Free Exercise: Free Exercise and Substantive Due Process Entitlement Claims in City of Boerne v. Flores, 31 Creighton L. Rev. 693 (1998).
School prayer controversy
Richard Collin Mangrum, School Prayer Controversy, in The 1996 Law Day for the Clergy (Creighton Univ. Sch. of Law ed., 1996).
Role of suspicion in federal equal protection
Paul E. McGreal, The Role of Suspicion in Federal Equal Protection, 8 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 183 (1999).
Recently, Professor Jed Rubenfeld wrote an essay arguing that the Supreme Court's strict scrutiny test for equal protection works best to "smoke out" the purpose of laws to determine whether they were enacted because of ...
Equal protection and intersectionality -- A reply to Professor Yarbrough
Paul E. McGreal, Equal Protection and Intersectionality – A Reply to Professor Yarbrough, 38 S. Tex. L. Rev. 1167 (1997).
Flawed economics of the dormant Commerce Clause
Paul E. McGreal, The Flawed Economics of the Dormant Commerce Clause, 39 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1191 (1998).
Paul E. McGreal, Constitutional Illiteracy, 30 Ind. L. Rev. 693 (1997) (reviewing Louis Michael Seidman & Mark V. Tushnet, Remnants of Belief: Contemporary Constitutional Issues (1996)).
Some Rice with your Chevron? Presumption and deference in regulatory preemption
Paul E. McGreal, Some Rice with Your Chevron? Presumption and Deference in Regulatory Preemption, 45 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 823 (1995).
This Article compares the equal protection analysis of the United States Supreme Court with the equal protection analysis of the Alaska Supreme Court. It first looks at the federal equal protection doctrine and the various ...
Alaska equal protection: Constitutional law or common law?
Paul E. McGreal, Alaska Equal Protection: Constitutional Law or Common Law?, 15 Alaska L. Rev. 209 (1998).