Now showing items 1-2 of 2
Interpreting Nebraska Rule of Evidence 702 after the Nebraska Supreme Court adopted the federal Daubert standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Schafersman v. Agland Coop
Richard Collin Mangrum, Interpreting Nebraska Rule of Evidence 702 After the Nebraska Supreme Court Adopted the Federal Daubert Standard for the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Schafersman v. Agland Coop, 35 Creighton L. Rev. 31 (2001).
Stenburg v. Carhart: Poor interpretivist analysis, unreliable expert testimony, and the immorality of the Court's validation of partial-birth abortion legislation
Richard Collin Mangrum, Stenburg v. Carhart: Poor Interpretivist Analysis, Unreliable Expert Testimony, and the Immorality of the Court's Validation of Partial-Birth Abortion Legislation, 34 Creighton L. Rev. 549 (2001).