Now showing items 1-10 of 23
Presumptions: 350 years of confusion and it has come to this
G. Michael Fenner, Presumptions: 350 Years of Confusion and It Has Come to This, 25 Creighton L. Rev. 383 (1992), reprinted in Evidence for the Nebraska Practitioner (Creighton Univ. Sch. of Law ed., 1994).
The title of this article — Presumptions: 350 Years of Confusion and It Has come to This — is pretty much self-explanatory. The article begins with “the bottom line on presumptions. They are inextricably confused devices ...
Evidentiary privilege in Nebraska
R. Collin Mangrum, Evidentiary Privilege in Nebraska, 23 Creighton L. Rev. 235 (1990), reprinted in Evidence for the Nebraska Practitioner (Creighton Univ. Sch. of Law ed., 1994).
Learned treatise hearsay exception
Richard Collin Mangrum, Learned Treatise Hearsay Exception, Prairie Barrister, 1999 no. 2, at 3.
On February 26, 1999, the Nebraska Legislature adopted LB64 which amended the Nebraska Rules of Evidence to include the learned treatise hearsay exception. This article is an excerpt from the recently revised Mangrum on ...
Law professor reveals shocking truth about hearsay
G. Michael Fenner, Law Professor Reveals Shocking Truth About Hearsay, 62 UMKC L. Rev. 1 (1993).
This article exposes shocking, never-before-revealed truths about hearsay evidence. In my study of the rule, leading to my book (THE HEARSAY RULE, 2d edition, published in 2009 by Carolina Academic Press) I have discovered ...
Daubert handbook: The case, its essential dilemma, and its progeny
G. Michael Fenner, The Daubert Handbook: The Case, Its Essential Dilemma, and Its Progeny, 29 Creighton L. Rev. 939 (1996).
This Article is about Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. It is not about whether Daubert is a good decision or whether it is a bad decision, although, in my view, Daubert is a pretty good decision given the statute ...
Evidence review: The past year in the Eighth Circuit, plus Daubert
G. Michael Fenner, Evidence Review: The Past Year in the Eighth Circuit, Plus Daubert, 28 Creighton L. Rev. 611 (1995).
Privileges, hearsay, and other matters
G. Michael Fenner, Privileges, Hearsay, and Other Matters, 30 Creighton L. Rev. 791 (1997).
Here's the real trouble with experts
G. Michael Fenner, Here's the Real Trouble with Experts, Creighton Law., Fall 1996, at 12.
"Here's the Real Trouble with Experts!" answers this question: Does it seem that experts have become a much bigger problem than they used to be? It seems so to me, and this piece explores what I see as the ten principal ...
G. Michael Fenner, Presumptions, in Evidence (Neb. Continuing Legal Educ. ed., 1991).
Nebraska's evidentiary rules on relevancy
R. Collin Mangrum, Nebraska's Evidentiary Rules on Relevancy, 29 Creighton L. Rev. 119 (1995).