Now showing items 11-20 of 27
Some reaffirmation FAQ's
Marianne Culhane & Michaela White, Some Reaffirmation FAQ's, Neb. Law., May 2001, at 10.
Problem with general jurisdiction
Patrick J. Borchers, The Problem with General Jurisdiction, 2001 U. Chi. Legal F. 119.
This article examines the U.S. phenomenon of so-called "general jurisdiction." General jurisdiction involves unrelated activities of a corporation or business entity that are so pervasive that they subject the corporation ...
Learning on the electronic frontier
Edward A. Morse, Learning on the Electronic Frontier, Creighton Law., Spring 2001, at 12.
Elderly and civil procedure: Service and default, capacity issues, preserving and giving testimony, and compulsory physical or mental examinations
Larry L. Teply, The Elderly and Civil Procedure: Service and Default, Capacity Issues, Preserving and Giving Testimony, and Compulsory Physical or Mental Examinations, 30 Stetson L. Rev. 1273 (2001).
This article discusses the important elder law issues in the context of civil litigation and how many procedural rules affect the elderly directly. The author focuses on four main subject areas that affect the elderly the ...
Applying Coase to qui tam actions against the states
Paul E. McGreal & DeeDee Baba, Applying Coase to Qui Tam Actions Against the States, 77 Notre Dame L. Rev. 87 (2001).
Likely impact of the ALI 'Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution' on property division
Craig W. Dallon, The Likely Impact of the ALI 'Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution' on Property Division, 2001 BYU L. Rev. 891.
Mangrum on Nebraska evidence
R. Collin Mangrum, Mangrum on Nebraska Evidence (2001).
Bush should take his cue from the Bible
Michael Kelly, Op-Ed, Bush Should Take His Cue from the Bible, Lansing St. J., Aug. 9, 2001, at 10A.
Interpreting Nebraska Rule of Evidence 702 after the Nebraska Supreme Court adopted the federal Daubert standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Schafersman v. Agland Coop
Richard Collin Mangrum, Interpreting Nebraska Rule of Evidence 702 After the Nebraska Supreme Court Adopted the Federal Daubert Standard for the Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Schafersman v. Agland Coop, 35 Creighton L. Rev. 31 (2001).
Stenburg v. Carhart: Poor interpretivist analysis, unreliable expert testimony, and the immorality of the Court's validation of partial-birth abortion legislation
Richard Collin Mangrum, Stenburg v. Carhart: Poor Interpretivist Analysis, Unreliable Expert Testimony, and the Immorality of the Court's Validation of Partial-Birth Abortion Legislation, 34 Creighton L. Rev. 549 (2001).