Now showing items 11-20 of 196
Layperson's guide to criminal law
Raneta Lawson Mack, A Layperson's Guide to Criminal Law (1999).
State aid to students in religiously affiliated schools: Agostini v. Felton
R. Collin Mangrum, State Aid to Students in Religiously Affiliated Schools: Agostini v. Felton, 31 Creighton L. Rev. 1155 (1998).
Falling star of free exercise: Free exercise and substantive due process entitlement claims in City of Boerne v. Flores
R. Collin Mangrum, The Falling Star of Free Exercise: Free Exercise and Substantive Due Process Entitlement Claims in City of Boerne v. Flores, 31 Creighton L. Rev. 693 (1998).
School prayer controversy
Richard Collin Mangrum, School Prayer Controversy, in The 1996 Law Day for the Clergy (Creighton Univ. Sch. of Law ed., 1996).
Reflections on the Rule of Law and clear reflection of income: What constrains discretion?
Edward A. Morse, Reflections on the Rule of Law and Clear Reflection of Income: What Constrains Discretion?, 8 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 445 (1999).
This article examines the Rule of Law ideal in the context of federal tax law. Constraining government discretion is a core concern of the Rule of Law. Rules have traditionally played an important role in providing that ...
State taxation of Internet commerce: something new under the sun?
Edward A. Morse, State Taxation of Internet Commerce: Something New Under the Sun?, 30 Creighton L. Rev. 1113 (1997).
Criminal law: Principles and cases
Thomas J. Gardner & Terry M. Anderson, Criminal Law : Principles and Cases (6th ed. 1996).
Article 2 problems
Terry M. Anderson, Article 2 Problems, in Update on Commercial Law (Creighton Univ. Sch. of Law ed., 1994).
New Uniform Commercial Code
Terry M. Anderson, New Uniform Commercial Code, in Update on Commercial Law (Creighton Univ. Sch. of Law ed., 1992).
Role of suspicion in federal equal protection
Paul E. McGreal, The Role of Suspicion in Federal Equal Protection, 8 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 183 (1999).
Recently, Professor Jed Rubenfeld wrote an essay arguing that the Supreme Court's strict scrutiny test for equal protection works best to "smoke out" the purpose of laws to determine whether they were enacted because of ...