Now showing items 21-30 of 74
Back to the future: Original intent as a means for vitalizing the fourteenth amendment in the context of race
Raneta J. Lawson, Back to the Future: Original Intent as a Means for Vitalizing the Fourteenth Amendment in the Context of Race, 5 St. Thomas L. Rev. 245 (1992) (reviewing Donald E. Lively, Constitution and Race).
State aid to students in religiously affiliated schools: Agostini v. Felton
R. Collin Mangrum, State Aid to Students in Religiously Affiliated Schools: Agostini v. Felton, 31 Creighton L. Rev. 1155 (1998).
Falling star of free exercise: Free exercise and substantive due process entitlement claims in City of Boerne v. Flores
R. Collin Mangrum, The Falling Star of Free Exercise: Free Exercise and Substantive Due Process Entitlement Claims in City of Boerne v. Flores, 31 Creighton L. Rev. 693 (1998).
Challenging the scope of free exercise
Richard Collin Mangrum, Challenging the Scope of Free Exercise, Newsl. (Ctr. for the Study of Religion & Soc'y), Spring 1998.
Executive excess v. judicial process: American judicial responses to the government's war on terror
Michael J. Kelly, Executive Excess v. Judicial Process: American Judicial Responses to the Government's War on Terror, 13 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 787 (2003).
The federal government's policy responses to the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the ensuing conduct of President Bush's war on terror have thrown American civil liberty rights into disarray. Attorney General Ashcroft and Defense ...
Opinion letter to the Nebraska Judicial Structure and Administration Task Force
G. Michael Fenner, Opinion Letter to the Nebraska Judicial Structure & Administration Task Force (June 1, 2007), in Nebraska Judicial Structure & Administration Task Force Final Report H-1 (Neb. State Bar Ass'n ed., 2007).
Flawed economics of the dormant Commerce Clause
Paul E. McGreal, The Flawed Economics of the Dormant Commerce Clause, 39 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1191 (1998).
Alaska equal protection: Constitutional law or common law?
Paul E. McGreal, Alaska Equal Protection: Constitutional Law or Common Law?, 15 Alaska L. Rev. 209 (1998).
Some Rice with your Chevron? Presumption and deference in regulatory preemption
Paul E. McGreal, Some Rice with Your Chevron? Presumption and Deference in Regulatory Preemption, 45 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 823 (1995).
This Article compares the equal protection analysis of the United States Supreme Court with the equal protection analysis of the Alaska Supreme Court. It first looks at the federal equal protection doctrine and the various ...
Paul E. McGreal, Constitutional Illiteracy, 30 Ind. L. Rev. 693 (1997) (reviewing Louis Michael Seidman & Mark V. Tushnet, Remnants of Belief: Contemporary Constitutional Issues (1996)).