Search

This paper discusses how the paradigm shift of evidence-based-medicine and the tools developed in that genre provide an important basis at every stage of any expert's "health related" testimony under the Daubert standard ...

Search

Filters

Handling expert testimony in Nebraska: Lessons from recent cases

Interpreting Nebraska's expert testimony evidentiary rules as applied to the family law context after the Nebraska Supreme Court adopted the federal Daubert standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Schafersman v. Aglan Coop

Interpreting Nebraska Rule of Evidence 702 after the Nebraska Supreme Court adopted the federal Daubert standard for the admissibility of expert testimony in Schafersman v. Agland Coop

Opinion and expert testimony in Nebraska

Kumho Tire Company: The expansion of the court's role in screening every aspect of every expert's testimony at every stage of the proceedings

New expert evidence standard

Stenburg v. Carhart: Poor interpretivist analysis, unreliable expert testimony, and the immorality of the Court's validation of partial-birth abortion legislation

Evidence-based medicine in expert testimony